There are two protected innovation issues here – copyright and trademark rights.
The copyright position is sensibly clear; if this is your unique illustration of the big name taken from life or your creative energy (maybe from an amalgamation of various pictures you have seen of that individual) at that point, unless you made the picture is a piece of your business or have concurred generally with somebody, the copyright in that picture has a place with you. The main likely exemption to this is the place you have thoughtlessly duplicated a past picture (say, one specific photo), in which case your illustration may encroach the copyright in that photo.
The trademark position is conceivably more mind-boggling. It is workable for any of us to enlist a picture highlighting our face as a trademark, and various big names have done this throughout the years. You should check whether this specific VIP has done as such, and, in the event that they have, regardless of whether the merchandise and enterprises for which the trademark is enlisted incorporate dress.
On the off chance that it does, at that point there are potential issues here; in spite of the fact that superstars in the past have now and then thought that it was hard to enlist and authorize trademarks of this sort, I presume you would prefer not to be on the wrong end of a fairly frightful specialists letter in the event that you can maintain a strategic distance from it!
Regardless of the possibility that the big name’s picture has not been enrolled as a trademark, there can once in a while be an issue with what is referred to in English law as “going off”. Fundamentally this is the place a merchant offering products or administrations proposes that those merchandise or administrations are some way or another supported by, for this situation, a notable individual. On the off chance that that recommendation is false, at that point in specific conditions that outstanding individual can sue the dealer.
The key inquiry to be addressed is the thing that capacity the picture is performing on the T-shirt; is it simply an embellishment (maybe an announcement by the wearer of the T-shirt of his or her help for the big name), or might it be able to be perused as an underwriting by the superstar of the T-shirt item? Practically speaking the response to that inquiry may rely upon whether the big name for this situation is by one means or another associated with the design business; this was the situation a year ago when Rhianna sued Topshop over their generation of a T-shirt bearing her picture.
One of the choosing issues, all things considered, was that Rihanna is something of a “form symbol” and surely had officially authorized her name and notoriety to another dressing producer, with the estimation of that permit being seemingly debilitated by the accessibility of the Topshop items on the high road.